Tom's blog

Wasting time on aging pinot noir

I can’t tell you the number of times I’ve been so impressed with the body and tannin in a California pinot noir, that I put a few bottles in the cellar to age — only to be disappointed several years later when I popped the cork.

I’ve come to the conclusion that just because a Burgundy ages well doesn’t mean a California or Oregon pinot noir will be just as rewarding. Why is that? Pinot noirs in Burgundy have more finesse than tannin. The ones I taste from the West Coast have a lot of alcohol and forward, often sweet fruit and high alcohol. One would think this character would allow them to age well, but that hasn’t been my experience.

Admittedly, this is an over-generalization. But the wines I recently opened from Ken Wright, Goldeneye, Penner-Ash and Panther Creek — mostly from the 2015 vintage — were over-ripe and flaccid. The only exception was the 2015 Etude Heirloom Pinot Noir which had a lot of structure, fresh fruit and still some fine tannins.

Lesson learned: drink your West Coast pinot noir within a couple of years.

Patience pays off

I had my concerns when I decided to hold a bottle of 2007 Louis Latour Corton-Charlemagne. I remember it wasn’t cheap — its a grand cru — and every year I pulled it from the rack only to put it back. But we were having a nice red snapper and I decided to open it. Could a 13-year-old chardonnay still be good?

It was. OMG, I wish I had a few more. Golden in color, luxurious and viscous texture, tropical fruit flavors and a heavy dollop of coconut. I cherished every sip and thought about it for hours after the last drop was consumed.

Not all chardonnays can stand the test of time. I’ve tasted 5-year-old California chardonnays that had oxidized or fell apart. But a grand cru from Burgundy can last decades. It’s what makes French Burgundy so collectible and it’s why no other chardonnay region can compare.

Today this wine costs close to $200 a bottle, which is well above what I’m willing to spend on wine. It’s worth it — but alas unaffordable.

Bonjour, Domaine Serene -- et, bon chance?

Ken and Grace Evenstad have always loved the chardonnay and pinot noir from Burgundy. In the late 1980s they launched one of the most successful pinot noir houses in the Willamette Valley and sought to pursue their dream of making exceptional wine in the United States.  Indeed, Domaine Serene has been winning awards ever since.

But the Evenstads couldn't let go of their Burgundian dreams. In 2015, they purchased a 15th century chateau -- Chateau de la Crée -- in Santenay. I would think that breakthrough would cause a stir in the chateau's tiny village of Santenay. After all, it wasn't that long ago that Robert Mondavi was rudely rebuffed by the French in an attempt to plant a vineyard in Languedoc. 

But, the Evenstads were no Mondavis.

"The deal was completed in a few months," said Ryan Harris, president of Domaine Serene.

An American wine producer buying an historic chateau of this order is more unusual than a French producer buying wine property in the United States. Moet-Chandon was among the first to do launch a sparkling wine company in California in 1973. Champagne makers Taittinger and Roederer soon followed. Then came Clos du Val, Dominus, Opus One (a partnership of Mondavi and Baroness Philippine de Rothschild). In Oregon, Burgundian Robert Drouhin of Maison Joseph Drouhin raised eyebrows -- and prestige -- when he launched Domaine Drouhin in Oregon's Willamette Valley. But the Evanstads were the first Oregonians to own a chateau in Burgundy.

Grace Evenstad, who was recently hosting a wine dinner in Naples, Fl., said the differences between making wine in Oregon and France were clear one day when she showed a Burgundian winemaker their Willamette Valley vineyards. 

"She said to me, 'Which rows are yours?'" Evenstad said.

In Burgundy, it is common for a vineyard to have multiple owners.

Harris said that throwing a lot of parties, meeting neighbors, and developing good relations with local officials paved the way for the purchase. But, the transition to making good wine was not so smooth.

Evenstad said, "Everyone is now gone."

Whether they left on their own or were replaced wasn't clear, but she said that they were surprised by the lack of "science" at Chateau de la Crée. She said vineyards lack adequate spacing between rows and even if the vineyards were bio-dynamically farmed -- whatever that means in France -- the pesticides and other chemicals from neighboring vineyards were wafting onto those of Chateau de la Crée.

Ken and Grace Evenstad.

Ken and Grace Evenstad.

She was quick to distance Domaine Serene from the pinot noirs being poured at the tasting. "They aren't ours," she warned, lest someone came away with an unfavorable impression of their new venture. 

Despite the caveat, I enjoyed the Chateau de la Crée Clos de la Confrerie Monopole Santenay.

The tasting bravely paired a Domaine Serene pinot noir with a Chateau de la Crée pinot noir and there was an obvious New World vs. Old World difference. The Santenay wines had an earthy, barnyard profile classic to Burgundy and its terroir. However, the Domaine Serene Evanstad Reserve was undeniably a superior pinot noir.

It will be interesting to watch what the Evenstads do with the wines from this historic chateau and how they manage the French. Will they Americanize them with bolder fruit, higher alcohols and more fruit extraction?

I don't think it is going to be as smooth as they think. They are asking the French to adapt to their practices and no matter how much better they are, it doesn't always go down well with the sensitive French.

Bon chance, Ken and Grace.